Pricing development best practice

Subscribe for free | Become a sponsor

Product pricing isn’t just about setting a number—it’s a complex process that influences how customers perceive your product’s value, impacts their decision-making process, and drives their purchase behavior. Understanding buyer psychology is critical to optimizing pricing strategies. In this article, we explore practical recommendations for best practices in product pricing, drawing from psychological theories, real-life examples, and results of marketing initiatives.

1. Price Anchoring: Create a Comparison Point

Theory: Anchoring Bias refers to the cognitive bias where individuals rely heavily on the first piece of information they encounter. In pricing, the first price consumers see sets the mental “anchor” for what they perceive as reasonable or expensive.

Do:

• Use tiered pricing models where a high-priced item (anchor) makes the mid-tier product seem like better value.

Example: Apple offers several versions of the iPhone, with the highest-priced model acting as an anchor. Many consumers choose the mid-tier option, perceiving it as a better deal relative to the most expensive model.

Result: A study in The Journal of Consumer Research found that when consumers are given multiple options with a high-priced anchor, they tend to select the middle option, boosting overall sales of mid-priced items.

Don't:

• Avoid only offering one price. Without context, consumers have no way to gauge value, leading to hesitation or rejection of the offer.

2. Leverage Loss Aversion: Emphasize What Buyers Stand to Lose

Theory: Loss Aversion is a concept in behavioral economics which states that people feel the pain of losing something more strongly than the pleasure of gaining something of equal value. In pricing, emphasizing potential loss can drive urgency.

Do:

• Frame discounts in a way that highlights what consumers might lose by not acting quickly. For example, "Save $100 today, or pay full price tomorrow."

Example: Booking.com often uses phrasing like "Only 2 rooms left at this price!" which plays on loss aversion by creating a fear of losing out on the deal.

Result: Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research showed that using loss-framing language can increase conversion rates by up to 9% in e-commerce.

Don't:

• Don't overuse scarcity tactics. If consumers feel manipulated or see fake urgency too often, it can erode trust and decrease brand credibility.

3. Create Urgency and Scarcity: Drive Immediate Action

Theory: The Scarcity Principle in psychology posits that when something is perceived to be scarce, it increases its perceived value. Similarly, urgency creates a sense of immediacy in the buyer's mind, prompting faster decision-making.

Do:

• Use limited-time offers, countdown timers, or low-stock notifications to create urgency.

Example: Amazon’s “Lightning Deals” show a countdown timer with a limited number of units, creating a powerful sense of scarcity and urgency.

Result: A study by Harvard Business Review showed that consumers are 30% more likely to purchase products when scarcity is highlighted, especially in fast-moving industries like fashion and electronics.

Don't:

• Don’t create fake scarcity by displaying false timers or low-stock alerts that reset every time a consumer visits the page. This tactic damages trust and brand reputation.

4. Psychological Pricing: Using Charm Pricing and Tiered Models

Theory: Charm Pricing refers to the practice of ending prices in .99 or .95, which makes consumers perceive the price as lower. The human brain processes the leftmost digits first, making $9.99 feel significantly less than $10, even though the difference is only one cent.

Do:

• Use charm pricing (e.g., $19.99 instead of $20) to make products seem more affordable and appealing.

Example: JCPenney has historically used charm pricing to make their products appear more attractive, often pricing items at $19.99, $49.99, or $99.99.

Result: A study from the University of Chicago found that charm pricing increases sales by 24% when compared to rounded figures.

Don't:

• Avoid using charm pricing on premium or luxury products. For high-end items, consumers may associate rounded figures (e.g., $1,000) with higher quality and value.

5. Offer Discounts Strategically: Timing and Framing Matter

Theory: Temporal Discounting is the idea that people are more likely to choose immediate rewards over larger, delayed rewards. This psychological tendency means that time-limited discounts can motivate immediate action.

Do:

• Provide discounts during key sales periods (e.g., Black Friday, holiday seasons), or in response to customer behavior (e.g., abandoned cart discounts).

Example: Sephora frequently sends “limited-time” offers to its Beauty Insider members, offering 10-20% off, encouraging purchases during the offer window.

Result: A study by Deloitte found that 83% of consumers feel more inclined to purchase if there is a discount, especially if the offer is time-sensitive.

Don't:

• Avoid offering constant or excessive discounts. If consumers expect perpetual sales, they may delay purchases, waiting for better deals, thus eroding your product’s perceived value.

6. Highlight Value over Price: Focus on Benefits

Theory: Value-Based Pricing revolves around setting prices according to the perceived value your product offers to the consumer, rather than simply cost or competitor-based pricing.

Do:

• Emphasize what the customer gains from the purchase in terms of value, experience, and benefits rather than focusing purely on the price. For example, “This fitness tracker helps you achieve your health goals.”

Example: Tesla positions its electric vehicles not by emphasizing price but by focusing on the long-term benefits, including savings on fuel and reduced environmental impact.

Result: Tesla has become the leading electric vehicle manufacturer globally by focusing on the lifetime value of its products rather than competing on price.

Don't:

• Avoid making price the sole selling point. Competing solely on price can lead to a race to the bottom and devalues your product in the eyes of the customer.

7. FOMO (Fear of Missing Out): Harness Social Proof

Theory: The Bandwagon Effect suggests that people tend to follow what others are doing, especially if they believe they are missing out on something valuable. This can be leveraged using FOMO-based marketing strategies.

Do:

• Use social proof (customer reviews, testimonials, user-generated content) to showcase how many people have already purchased or benefitted from your product.

Example: Groupon uses FOMO messaging such as “80% bought this deal” and “Limited quantities available” to show that many people are purchasing, driving others to follow.

Result: A study by Psychology & Marketing found that FOMO messaging increases engagement by 27% in digital marketing campaigns.

Don't:

• Don’t manufacture false social proof. If customers find out that reviews or numbers are inflated or fake, it can severely damage your reputation.

8. Align Product Positioning with Pricing Strategy

Theory: Positioning Theory suggests that how a product is positioned in the market affects consumer perception. Price plays a crucial role in defining a product’s position as luxury, premium, budget, or mass-market.

Do:

• Ensure that your pricing aligns with the product’s perceived value and market positioning. Premium products should be priced higher to maintain an air of exclusivity.

Example: Louis Vuitton maintains its luxury image by positioning itself as exclusive, supported by premium pricing and limited distribution.

Result: Louis Vuitton is one of the most profitable luxury brands globally, generating billions in revenue while maintaining high-profit margins due to its premium pricing strategy.

Don't:

• Avoid mismatched pricing. Don’t price a high-quality product too low, or a lower-quality product too high, as this can confuse customers and damage your brand positioning.

9. Packaging Pricing with Product Bundles

Theory: Bundling involves selling multiple products together at a discounted rate compared to buying each product individually. It taps into the psychological desire for getting a “deal.”

Do:

• Offer bundles that provide perceived value, such as buy-one-get-one or tiered services that offer escalating benefits.

Example: McDonald's frequently offers meal bundles, where customers pay slightly less for a combo meal (burger, fries, drink) than if they purchased each item individually.

Result: Fast-food chains like McDonald’s report higher average order values with bundled meals, increasing overall revenue while providing value to customers.

Don't:

• Avoid bundling unrelated products. Bundling products that don’t complement each other can confuse consumers and reduce the perceived value of the offer.

Practical Tips on What Not to Do (Don’ts) with the Recommended Do’s:

1. Don’t Overcomplicate Pricing:

   • Do: Keep pricing simple and easy to understand. Overcomplicated pricing structures can confuse customers and cause decision fatigue.

   • Why: Studies show that confused customers are more likely to abandon their shopping carts.

2. Don’t Focus Only on Discounts:

   • Do: Emphasize long-term value instead of always offering discounts. Relying too much on discounts can erode perceived value and condition consumers to wait for sales.

3. Don’t Use Fake Urgency:

   • Do: Ensure that urgency and scarcity tactics are authentic and believable.

   • Why: If consumers detect fake urgency, they may distrust the brand and refrain from purchasing.

2.1 Freemium vs. Free Trials: Unlocking Buyer Psychology

The debate between freemium models and free trials is a long-standing one in the SaaS industry. Both pricing strategies aim to attract new users, but the key difference lies in how each taps into different psychological triggers and buyer behaviors. To understand which approach works best, we need to delve into the cognitive processes that influence consumer decision-making.

Understanding Freemium Through the Lens of Cognitive Dissonance Theory

The freemium model allows users to access a limited version of a product indefinitely, with the hope that they will eventually see enough value to upgrade to a paid plan. While this might seem like a straightforward approach, it can backfire if users become complacent and never feel the need to upgrade. This phenomenon can be explained by cognitive dissonance theory, which suggests that when people are given something for free, they may convince themselves that the free version is all they need, reducing their desire to pay for an upgrade.

In Postly's case, experimenting with a freemium model led to disappointing results, as users often stuck to the free plan without converting. This aligns with the psychological tendency for users to minimize the perceived difference between the free and paid versions, thus rationalizing their decision to remain at the free tier.

Free Trials and Prospect Theory: The Fear of Loss

On the other hand, free trials offer users full access to a product for a limited period, typically ranging from 7 to 30 days. Unlike freemium, free trials operate on the principle of prospect theory—a theory in behavioral economics that suggests people are more motivated to avoid losses than to acquire equivalent gains. The fear of losing access to valuable features once the trial ends often drives users to convert to paid plans.

Postly's experience with free trials supports this. The company found that offering a 7-day trial led to higher conversion rates than a 14-day trial, despite the shorter time frame. This can be attributed to the scarcity heuristic, where the perceived scarcity of time creates a sense of urgency, prompting users to take immediate action. A longer trial, while seemingly more generous, can dilute this urgency, making users procrastinate and feel less compelled to upgrade.

The Role of the Endowment Effect in SaaS Pricing

The endowment effect, another concept in behavioral economics, plays a significant role in the effectiveness of free trials. This theory posits that people value things more highly once they own them, even temporarily. During a free trial, users come to feel a sense of ownership over the product's features, making it harder for them to give them up when the trial ends. This psychological attachment increases the likelihood of conversion compared to a freemium model, where users may never experience the full value of the product.

In the SaaS world, this is particularly relevant because users often need to experience the product's full capabilities to understand its true value. Freemium models, by only offering limited features, fail to create the same level of attachment and perceived value that free trials can.

Balancing Perceived Value and Willingness to Pay

Pricing strategies, whether freemium or free trials, must carefully balance perceived value and willingness to pay (WTP). Research shows that customers are more likely to pay for products that they perceive to have high value, especially when the transition from free to paid feels justified. In the freemium model, the perceived value gap between the free and paid tiers must be significant enough to push users toward upgrading. If users feel that the free version meets their needs, they will be less inclined to pay for additional features.

In contrast, with a free trial, users experience the full value of the product upfront, making it easier for them to justify paying for continued access. However, if the trial period is too long, users may begin to question the product's value, leading to a lower conversion rate.

Decoding Buyer Behavior: The Role of Loss Aversion and Anchoring

A key factor that influences how buyers react to different pricing models is loss aversion, the idea that people prefer to avoid losses rather than acquire gains. In the context of free trials, users who have experienced the product's full capabilities may feel they are losing something valuable if they don't upgrade, triggering loss aversion and encouraging them to convert.

Conversely, freemium models often fail to tap into this sense of loss because users never gain full access to the product. As a result, they are less likely to feel like they are losing out by sticking with the free version.

Additionally, anchoring plays a role in how users perceive the cost of upgrading. In freemium models, the free version sets a low anchor, making the paid version seem expensive by comparison. In free trials, the full-featured experience acts as the anchor, making the paid version seem like a continuation of the status quo rather than an added expense.

Conclusion: Crafting a Buyer-Centric Pricing Strategy

In conclusion, the success of freemium versus free trials depends on the psychological triggers each model activates. Freemium models may appeal to users who are hesitant to commit financially, but they often fail to create a strong sense of value or urgency. Free trials, on the other hand, tap into loss aversion, the endowment effect, and prospect theory, making them a more powerful tool for converting users into paying customers.

For businesses like Postly, which experimented with both models, the data speaks for itself: free trials, particularly short ones, offer higher conversion rates by leveraging the psychological principles of loss aversion, urgency, and ownership. Ultimately, the choice between freemium and free trials should be based on an understanding of buyer psychology and how it influences purchasing behavior.

References:

1. Pujol, J. (2010). Freemium Economics: Leveraging the Power of Free.

2. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.

3. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.

4. Indie Hackers: Freemium vs. Free Trial Discussion - https://www.indiehackers.com/post/freemium-vs-free-trial-where-do-you-stand-e2fba41ba5

5. Indie Hackers: Free Trial vs. Forever Free Plan Debate - https://www.indiehackers.com/post/30-day-free-trial-vs-forever-free-plan-45bd581ac0?commentId=-N71Lqmh0n1tN6kAPPUG